The construction techniques that I used on paper
cannot be repeated in the fields without leaving their traces. Look for
instance at the large number of seven-fold stars that I needed and that
can no longer be found in the end result. It is absolutely impossible to
erase those figures in the fields. And yet, the underlying construction
lines found in the crop formation indicate that exactly the same
construction techniques were used when this formations was created!
Of course, one might claim that humans actually can
mark out those large figures in the fields - like for instance the large
seven-fold stars - without leaving a trace. Although this is quite
unlikely to be true, let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Just for
now... Suppose it is indeed possible to make those constructions without
leaving a trace. This means one can make absolutely fascinating
formations: formations without underlying construction lines!
From a human point of view, those are the ultimate
formations. In other words, if humans have the possibility to leave out
construction lines, they will definitely leave them out. If they can
make large seven-fold stars without leaving any construction lines, they
will never make smaller seven-fold stars, which do show
Now we have a catch-22 situation.
Either humans can make large seven-fold stars
without leaving construction lines, but that means we would not have
found any construction lines in the formation at all.
However, we did find them!
Or humans cannot make seven-fold stars without
leaving construction lines, but that means we should have found the
construction lines in the large seven-fold stars as well. However,
we didn't. They weren't there!
Whichever way you look at it, any human claim drops out for good. So
what conclusion can we draw now?
Construction lines are not the ultimate proof of
human activity. On the contrary. Construction lines are a strong
indication of non-human involvement.